Google could owe Oracle US $ 8.8bil in Android fight – Tech News

A file photo of Google's Pixel 2 and Pixel 2 XL smartphones. Oracle claims Google was in such a rush in the mid-2000s to create an operating system for mobile devices that the company used key parts of copyrighted Java technology without paying royalties. — Bloomberg

Google could owe Oracle Corp. bill of dollars for using Oracle-owned Java programming code in its Android operating system on mobile devices, an appeals court said, as the years-long feud between the two software giants draws near a close.

Google's use of Java shortcuts to develop Android went too far and was out of orbit of Oracle's copyrights, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled on March 27. The case – first filed in 2010 – was remanded to a federal court in California to determine how much the Alphabet Inc unit should pay. Oracle had been seeking US $ 8.8bil (RM33.98bil), although that number could grow. Google expressed disappointment and said it's considering its next steps in the case.

The dispute, which could have far-reaching implications for the entire software industry, has been divided into three categories: Silicon Valley the code is an exception to copyright law.

“It's a momentous decision on the issue of fair use,” lawyer Mark Schonfeld of Burns & Levinson in Boston, who's been following the case and is not involved. “It is very, very important for the software industry. I think it's going to go to the Supreme Court because of the Federal Circuit has a very controversial decision. “

Computer instructions

At issue are pre-written directions known as application programs interfaces, or APIs, which can work across different types of devices and provide the instructions for things like connecting to the internet or accessing certain types of files. By using the APIs, programmers do not have to write new code from scratch to implement every function in their software or change it for every type of device.

“The Federal Circuit's opinion upholds the fundamental principles of copyright law and makes it clear that Google violated the law,” Oracle General Counselor Dorian Daley said in a statement. “This decision protects creators and consumers from the unraveling of their rights.”

Google and its supporters contend that the ruling, if left to stand, would be harmed by the development of new software programs.

“We are disappointed in the court reversed the jury finding that Java is open and free for everyone,” Google said in a statement. “This type of judgment will make apps and online services more expensive for users.”

Limited freedom

Oracle said its APIs are available for those who want to build applications for computers and mobile devices, but draws the line at anyone who wants to use them for a competing platform or to embed them in an electronic device.

“The fact that Android is free of charge does not make Google's use of the Java API packages non-commercial,” the three-judge Federal Circuit panel in Washington ruled, noting that Android was generated more than US $ 42bil (RM162 .16bil) in revenue from advertising. It also said that Google had not made any alteration of the copyrighted material.

The damages are likely to be hotly contested, with Oracle wanting more than the US $ 8.8bil (RM33.98bil) it is at the trial, and Google is arguing the value is minimal, said lawyer Ping Hu, who heads the intellectual property group at Mirick O'Connell in Boston. The could mean more public information on how Google profits from an operating system that it offers for free.

The decision “is a major win for Oracle, but it's not the end of the war,” he said.

Rush to mobile

Oracle claims Google was in such a rush in the mid-2000s to create an operating system for mobile devices Java technology without paying royalties. Google, which gets the bulk of its profit from selling advertisements connected to search results, faced an “existential threat” because its search was not optimized for mobile devices, according to Oracle.

Google countered that Oracle was just jealous because it did what Oracle could not – develop an operating system for mobile devices that was free and wildly popular. Google said it's used in Android in the Java language.

A federal jury in California agreed with Google in 2016, saying Google's actions were a “fair use” that was exempt from copyright law. Tuesday's Federal Circuit opinion reverses that verdict.

“the appeals court ruled.”

“the appeals court ruled.

Next steps

Google is likely to ask that either the three-judge panel reconsider its decision, or have the issue before all active judges of the court. The losing party could then ask the Supreme Court to take the case, which Google supporters are calling for.

The Supreme Court had previously declined to review a closely watched 2014 decision in which the Federal Circuit said the APIs were entitled to copyright protection. That ruling, along with the Tuesday's decision, “according to Meredith Rose, policy counsel at Public Knowledge.” The group submitted legal arguments supporting Google.

It “could have devastating effects on the competitiveness, openness, and development of the technology industry,” Rose said in a statement. “This could lead to higher prices, fewer choices, and worse products for consumers.”

Java was created by Sun Microsystems Inc. in the 1990s, and some have Oracle Oracle of violating Sun's pledge to ensure that Java is available. Oracle bought Sun in January 2010 for US $ 7.4bil (RM28.57bil) and sued Google fewer than eight months later.

Part of Google's defenses focused on the idea that Java was developed for desktop computers, while Android was created for phones and other mobile devices. Oracle is sought to extend the case to desktops, where the Android is now available, but the trial is said to be narrowly focused. – Bloomberg

Source link